Work/Life Balance—A Survey

Work/Life Balance—A Survey

Source: Accounting Office Management & Administration Report

It may be more expensive to replace unsatisfied employees than to adopt work/life balance programs. IOMA surveyed 240 companies, including many professional firms. A majority reported favorable experience—better retention, higher morale, and improved productivity. But work/life balance programs are not without problems such as:

  • Providing consistency among employees.
  • Incurring resistance among supervisors.
  • Accommodating everyone in smaller firms.
  • Resentment when the program is not offered to all employees. For example, single employees may resent it when married people are offered work/life balance programs and they are not.
  • Clients wanting their work done when they need it, not when someone on flex time can do it.

 Here are some tips:

  • Some firms require a core group—those with the most client contact—to work regular hours.
  • A communication program is important—to get employees to understand that the program benefits the organization.
  • Communications should emphasize that abuse of privileges harms everyone in the firm.
  • Job descriptions can highlight what kind of work can be subject to flex time.
  • Rewards for unused time can help assuage those who can’t take time off. A time bank can be created that allows a certain amount of vacation, sick, and personal time. Employees don’t have to feign illness.
  • The firm must not lose focus on its mandate to serve clients and be productive.

The following table, summarizing the survey results is reprinted with permission from IOMA.

Table 1. Work/Life Balance Programs Companies Offer Now and Will in Next 12 Months, by Number of Employees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Employees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall

1 to 350

351 to 1,000

More Than
1,000

No
Response

Flexible work hours (year-round)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now offer

57.0%

53.0%

61.5%

56.5%

66.7%

 

Will offer

4.1

4.0

3.8

4.3

4.8

Flexible work hours (seasonal)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now offer

35.1

32.0

38.5

37.7

33.3

 

Will offer

2.1

2.0

3.8

1.4

2.0

Telecommuting (full-time)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now offer

20.7

8.0

15.4

40.6

28.6

 

Will offer

3.3

2.0

1.9

4.3

9.5

Telecommuting (part-time)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now offer

35.5

32.0

38.5

34.8

47.6

 

Will offer

4.1

1.0

5.8

5.8

9.5

Job sharing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now offer

21.5

14.0

19.2

31.9

28.6

 

Will offer

2.9

3.0

1.9

4.3

0.0

Part-time opportunities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now offer

74.0

65.0

88.5

78.3

66.7

 

Will offer

5.0

3.0

9.6

1.4

14.3

Leave in small increments1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now offer

82.6

83.0

88.5

79.7

76.2

 

Will offer

4.5

3.0

9.6

2.9

4.8

Paid-time-off policy2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now offer

55.0

62.0

48.1

49.3

57.1

 

Will offer

6.6

4.0

7.7

8.7

9.5

Banks of time3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now offer

7.4

8.0

3.8

7.2

14.3

 

Will offer

2.5

1.0

1.9

4.3

4.8

1for child’s dr. appointment, ball game, and the like.

 

 

2combines sick, vacation, and other time off.

 

 

3from busy periods to be ‘drawn on’ during slow periods.

 

(Source of tables: IOMA)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2. Employee Types to Whom Companies Offer Work/Life Balance Programs,

 by Number of Employees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Employees

 

 

 

 

 

 

More Than

 

 

 

Overall

1 to 350

351 to 1,000

1,000

No Response

 

All employees

73.0%

87.6%

64.4%

61.9%

57.1%

 

Manager/executive level only

2.4

1.1

0.0

4.8

7.1

 

Only employees in certain departments or in certain types of jobs

24.6

11.2

35.6

33.3

35.7

 

From Accounting Office Management & Administration Report, November 2006, p. 1. For subscription information contact Institute of Management & Administration, Inc., 3 Park Avenue, 30th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5902. One-year subscription $349. 212-244-0360, [email protected]. To read the complete article, click here.